• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Recent content by Sniffer

  1. Sniffer

    General Wolves News

    I understand where you are coming from but apart from the big games where we will sell out, I doubt that there will be 1000 others ready to rock up to see Sheffield United and spend the additional money that you don't. In the above example they'd be 29000 tickets sold at the additional cost and...
  2. Sniffer

    General Wolves News

    They need to be careful what they wish for... Losing 2000 STH's @ £35 per game with 19 games = £1,330,000 Replacing those with pay on the days at £42 for 10 games = £840,000 Having extra 1000 pay on the days for less appealing games (9) = £378,000 Total £1330000 - £1218000 = losing £112k -...
  3. Sniffer

    Luton (H) 27/4 - Build-Up & Match Thread

    Can't see a 1-2 loss in the opening post in the thread? Did Paul Stewart come on a sub for us in that one?
  4. Sniffer

    Keir Starmer at it again..

    Crap idea, un-costed blah blah blah, left wing lunatics. What do you mean that you don't have to pay anything as the franchise contracts come to an end? But Rail Minister Huw Merriman said the plans were "pointless" and "unfunded". He said Labour doesn't have a "plan to pay for the bill...
  5. Sniffer

    Tetchy Rish! at it again

    What a great day for the nation. From now on it doesn't matter if a certain East African country is involved in a war, a civil war, decides to shoot at innocent protesters, brings in laws that discriminates against its population etc etc etc it shall forever be deemed to be safe by the UK as our...
  6. Sniffer

    Fans Against VAR - Join us

    Was there a decision recently (thankfully for once not against us) where a penalty was given for a foul via a slow motion replay but ignored the fact that the player who had been fouled had just fouled the other player beforehand? I agree that slow motions for such instances aren't helpful.
  7. Sniffer

    Wolves 0-1 Bournemouth: Verdict Thread

    Off the ball incidents are going to being looked at from now on are they? Even taking away the fact the Bournemouth player pushes Cunha, even after the flailing arm, he isn't impeded in any way as he then harries Semedo and puts a challenge in on Doherty. Darren England was also on duty for the...
  8. Sniffer

    Tetchy Rish! at it again

    I'd have gone with Grant Shapps but each to their own.
  9. Sniffer

    Wolves 0-1 Bournemouth: Verdict Thread

    You should look at it, however it’ll make you feel worse.
  10. Sniffer

    Wolves 0-1 Bournemouth: Verdict Thread

    We were feckin shit but have been robbed of a point.
  11. Sniffer

    Bournemouth (H) 24/4: Build-Up & Match Thread

    Adrian Chiles? It’s an appalling decision. From the pictures I’ve seen it looks like a push by the defender who isn’t impeded enough to stop him making a challenge a split second later. Aresholes
  12. Sniffer

    General Wolves News

    Any tweets from Molineux yet?
  13. Sniffer

    Predict the Wolves Score

    Wolves 1-2 Bournemouth
  14. Sniffer

    Tetchy Rish! at it again

    I was commenting on the post previously mentioning that Labour wouldn’t do it. It would be wrong if they complain about the Conservatives not carrying through with a manifesto pledge and not having a plan themselves. I’m not as well versed as you @EpsomWolf on this subject however surely...
  15. Sniffer

    UKIP and Similar Watch

    Ben Habib is an odious character who stated that Brexit could never be a success due to the trade arrangements in Northern Ireland/Ireland. That being said, hiding behind the need to have peace on the Island of Ireland as an excuse for their utopia not working was nothing in comparison to...
Back
Top