I wouldn't be placing much value on either set of stats as the sample size is tiny. I find the problem with aerial duels (terrible name for a stat) is that they don't always consider that the player (WJ) may well be chesting the ball down with the defender behind him not going for the ball as...
My point is that experience sometimes is irrelevant, particularly if that experience is terrible.
Saunders, Johnson, Holden, Cotterill, Grayson, Holloway and Lambert have more experience than Henry.
I’d employ none of the above.
But they don't just survive off the tax payer do they?
And from what I can gather you just print more money don't you as governments don't spend tax payers money?
What about those people who are grandchildren of entrepreneurs/ lottery winners and have inherited wealth?
They have no choice of the circumstances they were born into.