• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Brighton 0-1 Wolves: Verdict Thread

Arguably better there aswell.
Can't have that. He's a vastly better player through the middle and Villa are noticeably weaker when he's not leading their line.
 
Can't have that. He's a vastly better player through the middle and Villa are noticeably weaker when he's not leading their line.

Ings is a better centre forward than Watkins so not sure how they'd be weaker.
 
Not for me. I'd much rather have Watkins for his all round game. He's a good finisher, can run the channels and is very good at pressing from the front, which will suit Gerrard perfectly.

Ings is a fantastic finisher, but doesn't match up to Watkins otherwise.
 
Ings is just a much better footballer. Watkins works harder and that's the only part of his game where he's above Ings. Game of opinions ayit.
 
Ings is very much a Raul to me; sometimes goes through games without making much impact but then will pop up and do something magical to score.

But he's old and basically made of paper at this point. I wouldn't have him on more than a free, much as I like him as a player.
 
Ings is the better player imo for the 50% of games a year he's fit for
 
How many players would you sign knowing ahead of time that they'd only appear in half your games at most?

Ings is good but definitely not on that sort of list for me.
 
Had 3 seasons for Southampton. Played every game 2019, 30 last year which are both pretty decent in terms of availability. 50% is an exaggeration.
 
Back
Top