• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Chelsea 2 - 0 Wolves: The Verdict

We are 12th in the form table for the last 6 games. 7 points less than spurs in that period. Only Sheffield United of those challenging for Europe were the same with 7 points from 6. We are where we deserve to be and I reserve the right to feel a little flat about it. I would not be at all surprised if we got to the E L final only to lose to a VAR goal [emoji1]
 
Oh come on. We are in the top quartile since lockdown. Stop picking stats to fit your narrative
 
We're bottom of the form table in the last 1 game.
 
Oh come on. We are in the top quartile since lockdown. Stop picking stats to fit your narrative

Christ on a bike! All thread we have talked about the last 6 games yet you chip in at the last minute saying I am picking a narrative for fucks sake! It’s only the last six games that have me disappointed! We won the three before that raising every fuckers hopes. Good god man I did not choose a narrative the whole thread is on six games
 
Ahem. They raised *some* people's hopes.

Like I say, don't get giddy when we go on tiny little runs and you'll feel far less enraged when we lose (as we always will at some point, as we aren't that good yet)
 
Just picking random six game snapshots doesn't make any sense though. I mean look at this after we beat City:

P6 W1 D2 L3 F5 A8 Pts 5

Quick, someone check we're safe from relegation!

Then we won four out of the next six and kept five clean sheets. Why is that the only measure we can use?! It proves nothing.
 
So to sum up then

Disappointment across the forum varies from mild to severe
We need to sign some upgrades to crack the top 6
Our form varies depending on how many games you look at.

Good stuff.

Now on to stressing about Europa and not signing players some gimp on Twitter says we are 100% after
 
So to sum up then

Disappointment across the forum varies from mild to severe
We need to sign some upgrades to crack the top 6
Our form varies depending on how many games you look at.

Good stuff.

Now on to stressing about Europa and not signing players some gimp on Twitter says we are 100% after

That about covers it.......its almost like there are different people on the forum with different views
 
If you really think Arsenal Sheffield United Burnley chelsea we’re decent games when we played anywhere near our best then there is no debating with you.

Me, I am comfortable trusting my eyes and stating that we did not play well in any of these 4 of the last 6 games and therefore blew our chance of league qualifying for Europe barring a Chelsea win next week

But if you really see it differently and are happy with it that’s your call. I am still pissed off
 
No-one even made that point, this is the second time today you've answered a point that no-one was making...
 
We were fine against Burnley and deserved to win. We were fine against Sheffield United if not great and deserved a point. Arsenal schooled us. Chelsea we’re fine until the referee gives a nonsense and our heads drop because the dream dies.

I disagree with you, and I’m proud of that.
 
Mate, you're talking to me, not someone else. Stop jumping your points around, it makes no sense and I can't have a conversation with you if you're answering stuff I haven't even said. Like I say, that's twice now, you seem to think it makes perfect sense but to everyone else it's gibberish.

Imagine if you and I were sat in a pub, you asked a question about Ruben Neves then I overheard someone else talking about Steve Corica and I started banging on about him. Would be quite confusing.

I honestly haven't been able to follow anything you've said today properly, it's all over the show. And I mean that with respect. Just focus on what you're trying to say because at the minute, I can't help you.
 
Mate, you're talking to me, not someone else. Stop jumping your points around, it makes no sense and I can't have a conversation with you if you're answering stuff I haven't even said. Like I say, that's twice now, you seem to think it makes perfect sense but to everyone else it's gibberish.

Imagine if you and I were sat in a pub, you asked a question about Ruben Neves then I overheard someone else talking about Steve Corica and I started banging on about him. Would be quite confusing.

I honestly haven't been able to follow anything you've said today properly, it's all over the show. And I mean that with respect. Just focus on what you're trying to say because at the minute, I can't help you.

Hence the question mark. I had no idea what you were replying too. My response was to Paddington and his nonsense stats.
 
I was pointing out how randomly picking six games doesn't work and then questioning why that suddenly is the only measure you can use, I don't remember that ever being the case.

Then this pops up:

If you really think Arsenal Sheffield United Burnley chelsea we’re decent games when we played anywhere near our best then there is no debating with you.

And I have no idea what's going on.

You can pick your own fights with Pad, that's his business :) But I've just got very confused with this whole exchange for nearly 24 hours, and I'm now very, very tired.

I would pick one battle at a time rather than 8. That applies outside of the forum too :D
 
I was pointing out how randomly picking six games doesn't work and then questioning why that suddenly is the only measure you can use, I don't remember that ever being the case.

Then this pops up:



And I have no idea what's going on.

You can pick your own fights with Pad, that's his business :) But I've just got very confused with this whole exchange for nearly 24 hours, and I'm now very, very tired.

I would pick one battle at a time rather than 8. That applies outside of the forum too :D

Me too. I do like multi tasking.
 
Back
Top