Welcome to Wolves Ryan Bennett

[Dinowolf]

http://www.wolves.co.uk/news/article/2016-17/news-bennett-to-join-wolves-3727607.aspx

Thelwell appointment

 

[Lupo]

This year's Lonergan?

 

[Kenny]

This year's Lonergan?

If he can kick straight and claim crosses he can replace Lonergan.

 

[Jack Regan]

http://www.wolves.co.uk/news/article/2016-17/news-bennett-to-join-wolves-3727607.aspx

Thelwell appointment

Well we have given him the standard Thelwell 3 years.

 

[Aikiwolf]

Welcome Ryan, bit of a MOR signing but I wish him well.

 

[FrankMunro-371]

So despite all the rumours, Thelwell is still in charge of recruitment.

 

[Deutsch Wolf]

Not pleased with this one, he's horrendously prone to errors and nothing special when at his best.

As I said on the other thread, if we sell EEL and it mostly funds Bennett's wages for a year then I suppose that's just about ok as that would be an upgrade, but I don't think improving on one centre half who won't play with another who shouldn't play is really a priority for us.

 

[Aikiwolf]

This year's Lonergan?

This year's less passionate Stearman.

 

[Tony Towner]

For the conspiracy theorists out there, it only shows the back of the shirt, they always put the name on the front for unveilings. Now it might be that they don't want him with an old kit, but alternatively have The Money Shop been paid off and if so did they charge us 2000% interest to do so?

 

[Templeton Peck]

After extensive research (2 minutes on a Norwich forum) he appears to be thoroughly mediocre and more suited to a hoof style team.

 

[Lycan]

For the conspiracy theorists out there, it only shows the back of the shirt, they always put the name on the front for unveilings. Now it might be that they don't want him with an old kit, but alternatively have The Money Shop been paid off and if so did they charge us 2000% interest to do so?

They stopped doing that stupid front of the shirt thing when Fosun bought us.

 

[Kenny]

For the conspiracy theorists out there, it only shows the back of the shirt, they always put the name on the front for unveilings. Now it might be that they don't want him with an old kit, but alternatively have The Money Shop been paid off and if so did they charge us 2000% interest to do so?

Stopped doing the name on the front last season.

 

[Langers]

For the conspiracy theorists out there, it only shows the back of the shirt, they always put the name on the front for unveilings. Now it might be that they don't want him with an old kit, but alternatively have The Money Shop been paid off and if so did they charge us 2000% interest to do so?

I actually wondered that but I think it's been a while since they put new signings names on the front.

 

[Templeton Peck]

I know nothing of the mechanics of transfers. Is there anyway this could have been agreed under Lambert and it's somehow too late for us to get out of it?

 

[Tony Towner]

They stopped doing that stupid front of the shirt thing when Fosun bought us.

Stopped doing the name on the front last season.

OK.....sorry, I'll go back to my moon landings shadow photos

 

[Parkins left foot]

Lets hope that this is the last of the recruitment's at this level - not that much better than what we have (though not significantly worse either)

Would hope for better later

 

[Lupo]

Lambert signed him for Norwich so would suggest was already in the pipeline with PL/KT. Would have been the first name of the Lambo revolution :icon_cry:

 

[Kenny]

So the Lambert leak was Mendes would be 100% in charge of transfers....Lambert goes and we sign one of his targets. Expensive but top pranking by Jeff Shi. Billionaire bantz.

Won't get my underwear in a twist on this deal. Have a feeling the next 3 or 4 deals will be very different

 

[Templeton Peck]

Lambert signed him for Norwich so would suggest was already in the pipeline with PL/KT. Would have been the first name of the Lambo revolution :icon_cry:

Steele Bennett Hanley Hugill. Pure sex.

 

[Tony Towner]

I know nothing of the mechanics of transfers. Is there anyway this could have been agreed under Lambert and it's somehow too late for us to get out of it?

I'm guessing he signed an intention to sign contract weeks ago before the Lambert situation kicked off, he's not officially our player until July so something has been sorted earlier than the official deadline. Clearly the club didn't want to announce it when the Lambert departure was still fluid. That said, there could have been a 'things have changed, do you really want to be here' conversation.