• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

West Ham (A) - verdict

Tredman

Missing ) If found please return
Joined
Oct 22, 2011
Messages
24,111
Reaction score
9,744
Match day thread is almost as embarrassing as the performance.

Blame starts (again) in CM for me, too passive and too little support for the forward and defence. Either play 3 or play Donk as one of the 2
 
I have faith in Nuno and the players to set that right, but Christ in Heaven, they sure have given themselves a shit ton of work to do in getting there.
 
We were lucky we didn't lose by more goals.
 
Having only watched since just before the fourth goal, all I can offer is "ffs".
 
Hoping somebody can share their version of positives from that performance for me.

We looked second class in every way shape and form.

Early days but can't really say Semedo is Barcelona class yet. Lacked tracking back and lacked the influence attacking. Hard to judge when the entire team bar Neto were shite.

We need a change in midfield. Soucek proved with his runs in behind what were lacking when we go neves/moutinho. They're too similar.
 
Utter wank

Embarrassing. Utterly thrashed.

Could have been 7.
 
Did anyone come out of that with credit? Thought Neto kept going but other than that it was really bad’. Traore has to play out wide if he plays. Not through the centre
 
Positives: Semedo looked OK, Hoever looked better.

We need to get Boly back to lcb and I think we need to play 352. There was far too much space between the defence and midfield and that allowed runners directly at our back three. 352 allows Neves to be a bit deeper and block that space.
 
Poor all round performance but don’t see Fabio as a 35 million player. Missing Jota
 
Awful defensive performance and disjointed in attack.

We missed Podence; Semedo needs time to bed in (and get used to playing with Adama- which isn't an easy task), and Marçal needs to get fit quick as Vinagre just isn't up to it.

Hoping for a much-improved performance against Fulham.
 
Positives: Semedo looked OK, Hoever looked better.

We need to get Boly back to lcb and I think we need to play 352. There was far too much space between the defence and midfield and that allowed runners directly at our back three. 352 allows Neves to be a bit deeper and block that space.

I definitely agree on Boly to LCB and 3-5-2, but that means Donk as RCB - so a midfield 3 of Moutinho, Neves and Vintinha? Doesn’t work for me.
 
Did anyone come out of that with credit? Thought Neto kept going but other than that it was really bad’. Traore has to play out wide if he plays. Not through the centre

Hoever, Vitinha, and Fabio looked okay, at least relative to everybody else.

But as Slink rightly said on the match thread, it was a combination of shite individual performances and probably the most unbelievable tactical cock up Nuno has ever made.

Credit to West Ham, they took the rope we gave them firmly, but Christ, we gave them a ton of rope to hang us with.
 
Awful tonight but have faith in Nuno to turn it around. Dendoncker has to come back in next week for Moutinho, thought Hoever looked good too.

We looked like a team who expected to turn up and win with none of the hard work. We're not there yet lads.
 
I definitely agree on Boly to LCB and 3-5-2, but that means Donk as RCB - so a midfield 3 of Moutinho, Neves and Vintinha? Doesn’t work for me.

I thought Vitinia looked lively, tried to make things happen
 
Back
Top