I really don’t see much difference. Both are playing more and under different coaches., but you can’t accept Vitinha might be worth more, yet Kilman clearly is.
This isn't what I've said. I've said that if we didn't think he was worth 15m less than 6 months ago having a massively in depth Knowledge of the player, I'd be concerned if we suddenly paid 10/15m more on the basis of him doing exactly what he was capable of at the time we could have done so.
Similarly, if we'd sold Kilman prior to the season starting, he'd gone somewhere and played like he has, I'd be similarly concerned about our collective ability to judge players.