1:30 Storm Heart £20
2:10 Petit Tonnerre £10 ew
2:50 Readin Tommy Wrong £20 NAP
3:30 Corach Rambler £10 ew
4:10 Its On The Line £20
4:50 Allegorie De Vassy £20
5:30 Soninigino £10 ew
So her doing a bit of dodgy Photoshopping is wrong, but the Daily Heil changing and publishing an image for which she holds the intellectual property rights is fair game? Some double standards there, I would argue.
Have you thought about walking football? I started playing when I retired and usually play twice a week now. I haven’t been this fit for years despite walking and cycling a fair bit. It’s slower, so less stress on the joints, but the big thing is you are playing against old buggers who are in...
Presumably you are short sighted. As you get older you get more long sighted or in other words less short sighted. If you are long sighted like me, your eyesight gets worse as you get older. Then you get cataracts.
1:30 Mystical Power £20
2:10 JPR One £10 ew
2:50 Famous Bridge £10 ew
3:30 Iberico Lord £20
4:10 Lossiemouth £20
4:50 An Bradan Feasa £10 ew
5:10 Corbetts Cross £20 NAP
There's no doubt the editing isn't great and the news agencies will have just run it through their programmes that look for discrepancies in the file that indicate manipulation. Nobody makes a fuss when the local rag nicks my stuff off Facebook and edits out the watermark though.
As a fellow amateur photographer, I have every sympathy for her. Unpleasant know-alls blowing your pictures up to super resolution, so they can tell you how crap they are, or insinuate they are AI manipulated, is par for the course.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.