• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Shamima Begum

D

Deleted Cyber

Guest
A 19 year old British citizen Shamina Begum who chose to go and fight for Islamic state is currently in a Syrian refugee camp, having already had two children who have since died. She wants to come home but reports show she has no remorse .

Twitter in meltdown.

Discuss.
 
She should be able to walk from Syria then.
 
As it stands she hasn't been convicted of anything, so she should be able to come back and face any applicable charges.
 
We only win these ideological wars by sticking to our ideas, principles and beliefs. One of which is the rule of law.
 
Would effectively joining an enemy army/organisation be treason or something? I'm as forgiving and understanding as anyone, but this cunt can fuck right off for me. That said I'm sure there are probably more than a handful of genuine former combat personnel that served whilst we've been in conflict with their countries, currently over here. Absolutely guessing obvs
 
Again, treason is a criminal offence so surely she has to face a trial? Unless we just declare people guilty cos we read it in the sun or something.
 
tredman said:
Again, treason is a criminal offence so surely she has to face a trial? Unless we just declare people guilty cos we read it in the sun or something.
Click to expand...

Yeah, absolutely, if there's a charge there needs to be a trial. But she certainly shouldn't just be welcomed back like a holiday maker
 
So she comes back, grooms more people, sets up a few attacks, etc.

We know what she is and she isn’t hiding what she is. She can fuck off.
 
Del Woppio said:
Yeah, absolutely, if there's a charge there needs to be a trial. But she certainly shouldn't just be welcomed back like a holiday maker
Click to expand...
No definitely not, she should be arrested as soon as she sets foot in a country we have an extradition treaty with. But she is still British so deserves a fair trial.
 
Penk Wolf said:
So she comes back, grooms more people, sets up a few attacks, etc.

We know what she is and she isn’t hiding what she is. She can fuck off.
Click to expand...

I think she can be arrested abroad and stand trial in a foreign jail.
 
I consider myself a liberal but in this instance fuck her.
 
Just arrest her the moment she is in a country with which we have an extradition treaty. And then she is in custody until trial, and if convicted gets a life sentence. So she has absolutely no chance of grooming anyone.

We don't need fucking guantanamo waterboarding bollocks. She can enjoy one of our category A joints. Preferably a very isolated one.
 
i don't think she should be typically allowed back, having essentially admitted to agreeing with IS. if she gets back she should obviously be arrested.

there is a legal issue I guess if she is still considered a brit.

problem is I don't see how you can rehabilitate someone wedded to certain views. i'm sure there are people better informed about such matters than me though.
 
Just inform her if she steps foot in the country she'll be immediately arrested and charged. If she's found guilty she'll be jailed and her baby will be taken into protective services when it's born.

Her choice then.
 
Paddingtonwolf said:
Just arrest her the moment she is in a country with which we have an extradition treaty. And then she is in custody until trial, and if convicted gets a life sentence. So she has absolutely no chance of grooming anyone.

We don't need fucking guantanamo waterboarding bollocks. She can enjoy one of our category A joints. Preferably a very isolated one.
Click to expand...

Minimum cost is 38 k a year. 19 she can't go to full adult jail she would get yoi. Actually it would be tough to convict her of any criminal offence. As a female she would be restricted status similar to cat a for men if she was convicted.

Personally she made her decision, and on that basis forfeited her right to return , I know that's not what the law says though. She would need a life in protection . why should the public purse fund that?
 
Fuck her, leave her where she is.

This sob story that she was 16 when she went out there is bollocks, if you;re 16, you at least know that torture and killing and terrorism is bad. And she joined people who were bad. really bad. Even married the cunts. And she did it all of her own free will.

If Britain lets her back in, she will resurface in the news in relation to terror again, she's got previous and she cant be trusted. Some of you will think that sounds really hardsh but she is waaaaay too much of a risk.

Can you imagine, if she ends up blowing herself up, or assisting others in similar acts of atrocity, and innocent people die..... can you imagine how the families of the victims would feel?
 
She was 15 when she left wasn't she? Technically still a child, not that it should make a difference about whether she gets access to a fair trial.
 
Unpopular opinion here, apologies in advance.

If she isn't allowed back then we are effectively striping citizenship and making her stateless. Think long and hard about those consequences elsewhere. Also the child isn't radicalized.

Other side of the coin, far more deserving people out there who require help and support. Having heard the audio, rather than the written words, she sounds more like a immature teenager than she does a radicalized terrorist but I don't have the facts and neither do any of you. It's a tough dilemma and I understand why others hold a different opinion, but until she can escape Syria on her own two feet (we ain't sending civil servants in to get her), then it's a mute point. At which point she should be equally tried for any crimes committed and deradicalised. The suggestion of a Guantanamo type base is mind boggling ignorance of what Guantanamo is and what damage it has done. We're literally giving authority to other countries in the world to do the same, and not all of them offer the chance of a fair trial.

Don't think for one second I'd want her on the streets without deradicialisation though, just to be clear.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top