- Joined
- Oct 21, 2009
- Messages
- 57,995
- Reaction score
- 8,695
No that was a loss. Behave.Worst possible result
No that was a loss. Behave.Worst possible result
No if they’d won it just after it would’ve been or if VAR had got in the way of the equaliserWorst possible result
Loss = new manager = potentially saving the season. Win there’s potential for a GON bounce, with this (and subbing a sub) it just meanders on until the inevitable.No that was a loss. Behave.
… and your proof of that is?He's not out because he's injured, he's out because our gormless prick of a manager has backed himself into a corner and bottled the decision
He doesn't have any. If Johnstone was fit he'd have started.… and your proof of that is?
I don't think he would have done. He will next week though, Sa has taken the heat out of itHe doesn't have any. If Johnstone was fit he'd have started.
What do you expect, a signed confession?… and your proof of that is?
No. Any proof at all will do.What do you expect, a signed confession?
Except you didn't say it was 'a theory' or 'an opinion' which was why I asked for proof. So presumably you 'believe' he pulled Johnstone to one side and asked him to pretend he was injured because he was going to play him but he's now changed his mind because he might get abuse if he does. Or something like that. Who cares about attention on a web forum?It's a theory, Harry. Based on the prick's comments all week, I believe that he bottled starting his preferred keeper because of the abuse he'd have got for it. Asking for proof of an opinion is just weird, but hope that little bit of attention has done you some good xx
I presume you can prove he was injured?Except you didn't say it was 'a theory' or 'an opinion' which was why I asked for proof. So presumably you 'believe' he pulled Johnstone to one side and asked him to pretend he was injured because he was going to play him but he's now changed his mind because he might get abuse if he does. Or something like that. Who cares about attention on a web forum?
I presume you can prove he was injured?
An x-ray, MRI, doctors report or note from his mum will do.
How about taking his and the club's word on it? He says he's injured and they say he's injured. Why immediately assume that the player himself and assorted medical and coaching staff are all colluding in a big lie 'because our gormless prick of a manager has backed himself into a corner and bottled the decision'?I presume you can prove he was injured?
An x-ray, MRI, doctors report or note from his mum will do.
He can't hear you, mate