Tony Towner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2010
- Messages
- 40,582
- Reaction score
- 27,978
Thank fuck for that
Nothing PSR wise, I don't think. Original 5 year contract 5 years ago.What sort of fee do we need for it to be financially viable?
Nothing PSR wise, I don't think. Original 5 year contract 5 years ago.
Ah OK, we gave him an extra year after 2 years so £5.25m then.I think when they sign new contracts whatever was left to 'pay off' gets spread across the length of the new contract.
For example:
- £40M fee 4 year contract
- Year 1 £10M
- Year 2 £10M
- Year 3 £10M
- New 2 year contract
- Year 4 £5M
- Year 5 £5M
The only reason we need to increase our home grown numbers is because we are towards the top of our foreign allowance, not because we need to tick boxes numbers wise. No point signing anyone who you'd never want to play.Sky Sports News headline this morning is us “leading the race for Jamie Vardy”.
I think if we’re going to do a feel good English signing from Leicester this summer, to get our homegrown quota up - and to buffer our squad up a bit, I’d rather we have Conor Coady. Especially as we currently don’t have anyone to play that middle role should Agbadou get injured. Think Coads would have a superb impact off the pitch, in the dressing room, comes with that feel good factor - and he’s not a completely spent force on the pitch in a very specific role either.
Agree with a lot of that, but given a choice of Vardy or Coady, I know who I’d rather sign.The only reason we need to increase our home grown numbers is because we are towards the top of our foreign allowance, not because we need to tick boxes numbers wise. No point signing anyone who you'd never want to play.
Our 3 at the back is different to the one Nuno played, there's nothing similar to the way Agbadou plays that position to the way Coady did apart from how it looks on a team sheet. Also we seem to have a decent team spirit and leadership, we don't need someone to come in just for that.
Finally, he's 32, not 35 he should be looking to play. It'd be a bad move for him.
Agree with a lot of that, but given a choice of Vardy or Coady, I know who I’d rather sign.
Where do things stand with homegrown etc if/when Johnstone, Dawson & Doyle inevitably move on. Do they not need replacing? I’m not completely clued up on how it works, but they were chatting about this on the latest Wolves Fancast poddy & suggesting we’d have to sign some homegrown players?
If we haven't got a list of 30 players that are homegrown and improve on people like Doc, Bueno, Hwang and Tommy then every scout we have needs firing into the sunSurely there are a few home grown players around for sale at an affordable cost that don't need to be regular first team starters but also are not complete duffers and will do a job from the bench? Or am I bring too simplistic?(again)
You mean, like Dara O'Shea?If we haven't got a list of 30 players that are homegrown and improve on people like Doc, Bueno, Hwang and Tommy then every scout we have needs firing into the sun
There's not a home grown rule as such, it's the opposite. You can't have more than 17 overage none qualified players in your squad. So if you look at the 3 players you've named they don't need replacing because they are British to fill numbers as 2 don't play and one isn't even in the squad.Agree with a lot of that, but given a choice of Vardy or Coady, I know who I’d rather sign.
Where do things stand with homegrown etc if/when Johnstone, Dawson & Doyle inevitably move on. Do they not need replacing? I’m not completely clued up on how it works, but they were chatting about this on the latest Wolves Fancast poddy & suggesting we’d have to sign some homegrown players?
Tbf over the last couple of months Doc has been absolutely fine. Even Bueno has done OK in the last few games I've seen him, obviously he isn't home grown so not relevant.If we haven't got a list of 30 players that are homegrown and improve on people like Doc, Bueno, Hwang and Tommy then every scout we have needs firing into the sun