whistleblower
New member
- Joined
- May 2, 2015
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
I am not a Wolves fan but would like to advise you that you may wish to contact the FA and ask why Brentford appear to be allowed to break their rules.
Matthew Benham the owner of Brentford also owns Smartodds who invest money into creating models that predict the statistical probability of the outcomes of football matches and then place bets based upon these models (you can see here that Smartodds confirm they have a bet placement team: http://www.smartodds.co.uk/About/OurTeams ). Therefore although indirectly, Matthew Benham through Smartodds is betting on football. He confirms that he is aware of this relationship in this interview from 2013 http://www.probigbets.com/blog_detail.php?id=23 where he says “Do you actually bet on your own team? Never, it is strictly prohibited”. However at the time of the interview he was not just prohibited from betting on Brentford but on any competition in which Brentford competed, and since last summer FA rules were tightened further that prohibits football club employees from betting on any football at all.
I have previously emailed the FA to ask why Benham is allowed to continue to own both Smartodds and Brentford but they state that they “can’t comment on individual arrangements”, yet this is the same FA who are headed by Greg Dyke who says of FIFA: “Complete transparency is required if the actions of all those who bid, including England 2018, are to be judged fairly.” The same Greg Dyke who used to be chairman of Brentford!
I appreciate this is not as clear cut as a player popping into to his high street bookmakers and placing an accumulator on the coupon, however these are clear conflicts of interest occurring that the FA are unwilling to comment on.
Therefore I advise you that as you missed out on the play-offs thanks to Brentford you may want to ask the FA why Greg Dyke’s club appears to be getting favourable treatment.
Matthew Benham the owner of Brentford also owns Smartodds who invest money into creating models that predict the statistical probability of the outcomes of football matches and then place bets based upon these models (you can see here that Smartodds confirm they have a bet placement team: http://www.smartodds.co.uk/About/OurTeams ). Therefore although indirectly, Matthew Benham through Smartodds is betting on football. He confirms that he is aware of this relationship in this interview from 2013 http://www.probigbets.com/blog_detail.php?id=23 where he says “Do you actually bet on your own team? Never, it is strictly prohibited”. However at the time of the interview he was not just prohibited from betting on Brentford but on any competition in which Brentford competed, and since last summer FA rules were tightened further that prohibits football club employees from betting on any football at all.
I have previously emailed the FA to ask why Benham is allowed to continue to own both Smartodds and Brentford but they state that they “can’t comment on individual arrangements”, yet this is the same FA who are headed by Greg Dyke who says of FIFA: “Complete transparency is required if the actions of all those who bid, including England 2018, are to be judged fairly.” The same Greg Dyke who used to be chairman of Brentford!
I appreciate this is not as clear cut as a player popping into to his high street bookmakers and placing an accumulator on the coupon, however these are clear conflicts of interest occurring that the FA are unwilling to comment on.
Therefore I advise you that as you missed out on the play-offs thanks to Brentford you may want to ask the FA why Greg Dyke’s club appears to be getting favourable treatment.