Elephant Pyjamas
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2011
- Messages
- 17,655
- Reaction score
- 12,886
The way you're talking here PK (the aggression) reminds me of when you were telling us how wrong we were for thinking Israel were being OTT.
The way you're talking here PK (the aggression) reminds me of when you were telling us how wrong we were for thinking Israel were being OTT
Yeah? Didn't say it wasn't?
Right, so I can't have an opinion on whether Brexit, voting in Johnson and Trump twice was in the best interests of the people who voted for it?It's their vote so who on earth are you to pontificate about what other peoples best interests are?
Last bite from me
Yes you've aggressively told me that your opinion is that I can't I have an opinion.Aggressive
You're deflecting cos you have nothing of substance to add
Are you fucking dense? Don't bother answering that, I think the proof is there in your posts. You do know that when opposing something you're fighting against it? That when people opposed apartheid for instance, demonstrations against it were part of the 'fight against apartheid'. The violence I referenced was, valid on current evidence, the supposition that any opposition through mass protest was highly likely to met with a violent response from the Trump regime. And the question I posed was whether that would quell the protests or lead to more protests as a response.
If you can't understand that point, but want instead to spin it to fit your pre-determined opinion, knock yourself out genius.
FFS.TRUMP CIRCUS LATEST
: Huge concerns for allies of the US continue to pile up as it is revealed that former Fox News host and current actual Defense Secretary Pete ‘accidentally sending classified information to a journalist in a Signal group’ Hegseth has been bringing his wife (another former Fox host) to sensitive military meetings despite her having zero official role or clearance. He has also promoted his brother, a right-wing podcaster, to a senior position inside the Pentagon.
The only surprising thing about this is that it isn’t in any way surprising.FFS.
We seem to have no problem with China doing this.So you are happy for foreign states to subsidise industries, selling their goods into international markets at below market rates jeopardising the same industries in those countries? What happens if those manufacturers go bust and allow a monopoly from what was once state subsidised goods? They have the world by the bollocks and can charge what they like.