This was a serious question, if anyone can enlighten me.What am I missing here? Why would Fosun (or anyone else) want to own a business (Wolves or any other club) that makes those kinds of losses? Do these figures exclude sponsorship deals and the like?
Fosun can probably write off the losses against tax obligations elsewhere in the group, whilst in theory growing a brand and increasing the value of an asset.This was a serious question, if anyone can enlighten me.
It depends on the purchase price when buying the club, its marketing value for the Fosun group and its value now should they wish to sell. Once losses accumulated are above the difference between the purchase price and current value then you do have to wonder. The club has to stay in Premier League to keep the value high.This was a serious question, if anyone can enlighten me.
We are still worth more as a PL club than they have invested, although we must be coming close to break even. We shouldn't be making losses and should be self sustainable. It's their poor decision making and being taken to the cleaners by the agent they are invested in that's made us loss making. If they were to run us properly we wouldn't be.This was a serious question, if anyone can enlighten me.
Similar injury to Cunha then.Hwang out for 6 weeks
Maybe that’s why he’s not posting anymore…?If Johnny was so toxic you could have sent him back to Spain, carried on paying his wages and still have the opportunity to sign someone else.
Even if you buy the Jonny stuff as being the forward deal breaker, that was based on a 17th place position when it was clear by the end of January our floor was at least a couple of places higher than that, thus funding said forward.If Johnny was so toxic you could have sent him back to Spain, carried on paying his wages and still have the opportunity to sign someone else.
Was always going to happen when we didn’t sign an attacking player in January.
They are so, so naive it’s beyond a joke at this point.