MobNet Wolf
Active member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2010
- Messages
- 710
- Reaction score
- 221
Why bother touching it back? Why not shoot directly and almost certainly get a deflection?
Indirect free kick.WHY THE FUCK DO YOU MOVE THAT BALL YOU TWATS
And then as compensation you get a "chance" which is a far worse chance than a penalty.Should be the easiest decision in the world tbh. There must be a very very unambiguous caveat in the law that exempts it somehow as an indirect free kick you can't get sent off for or something?
It’s indirect you knobber. Someone has to pass/move it.WHY THE FUCK DO YOU MOVE THAT BALL YOU TWATS
Braindead wasn’t itWHY THE FUCK DO YOU MOVE THAT BALL YOU TWATS
Yes but with 11 players on the line, it WILL hit someoneIt’s indirect you knobber. Someone has to pass/move it.
Just cunt it, bound to get a deflectionIt’s indirect you knobber. Someone has to pass/move it.
What else are they supposed to do? It’s always getting twatted there.Yes but with 11 players on the line, it WILL hit someone
Albion keeper did that in the 90s. Didn't get sent off then either.Why is that not a red card? No different to a defender punching it off the line.
But the point being it's always going to touch someone with 11 players on the line.Indirect free kick.
It feels like Sheringhams backheel to Shearer is the only time anyone scored from that situation. Although I'm sure there have been instances.You know there was never a fucking chance we were scoring that
If it's handball , it's a penalty.... but the rules are different for a backpass...I don’t understand how he’s not been sent off? How is it any different to a defender doing the same thing?
It'll nickIndirect free kick.