Something that our fans, City fans and other fans think is about right?And his market value is…?
There is no answer but it’s more than £35m!And his market value is…?
Correct, and I refuse to believe City would have walked away if we insisted on another 5 or 10million.Market value by definition is the price the market is prepared to pay.
Harvey "Harveybarnes" Barnes?Doubt a big club has signed a young, oven baked PL player, coming off a big season statiscally in a shit team for £35m in recent times.
Didn’t even give it a week to find out.Correct, and I refuse to believe City would have walked away if we insisted on another 5 or 10million.
Newcastle were in the Champions League when they signed him?Leicester were relegated, in financial meltdown (and still breaking PSR even with sales), Newcastle don’t really fit the “big club” label yet (and certainly not 2 years ago) and he’s only ever really been a squad player for them. Even when he signed you saw it as bulking the squad rather than a star who was a nailed on starter.
So that’s very much apples and oranges for me.
They were. But that doesn’t automatically = Utd/Chelsea/Arsneal/City/Liverpool level.Newcastle were in the Champions League when they signed him?
For the avoidance of doubt I think it's a poor deal for Wolves.They were. But that doesn’t automatically = Utd/Chelsea/Arsneal/City/Liverpool level.
Their owners are rich but they don’t have the “big club” revenue streams to spend like the others.
Plus all the other points I made.
For the avoidance of doubt I think it's a poor deal for Wolves.
We'll see if my theory about the accounting period holds any weight. If we don't sign anyone in the next three weeks then obviously not.
I’m sure the people involved in multi million pound transactions, largely know more about finance than we do.
Yep (1st July normally)When would the JSL fee be taken? Is that set to fall in the next accounting period?