- Joined
- Aug 10, 2011
- Messages
- 62,521
- Reaction score
- -41,874
I did...but Jeff Shi and all that, so you never knowAh misinterpreted Kenny's post and thought he meant we covered all the wages![]()
I did...but Jeff Shi and all that, so you never knowAh misinterpreted Kenny's post and thought he meant we covered all the wages![]()
As already said, his wages off the books and that will be offset with another year of his contract gone and possibly a decrease in his value because of it. If he's not good enough now, he won't be good enough in the future.Not sure what we get out of this loan?
Can only sell what people want to buy, I guess.It needs to be both.
We desperately need rid of Guedes, Johnstone, Fabio and Hwang ASAP.
Can only sell what people want to buy, I guess.
Although it sounds like people actually do want Fábio and we’re doing our best to cock that up too!
So our representatives aren’t allowed to negotiate the sale of our player and it should be left for Silva’s agent to do so? I’m guessing it’s his side who are leaking this.
and here’s the original post.
Think you might need to read the article before you direct your anger.So our representatives aren’t allowed to negotiate the sale of our player and it should be left for Silva’s agent to do so? I’m guessing it’s his side who are leaking this.
My disdain for him just keeps growing.
I did before posting.Think you might need to read the article before you direct your anger.
The club introducing a 3rd party who wants his own pay cheque isn't doing much to minimize losses is it? And sort of feels like the thing that should draw ire to the club for bringing that party into the mix rather than the player who's had seemingly no part in that.I did before posting.
The likes of Dortmund and Leipzig wish to negotiate directly with the 22-year-old’s agent rather than through a third party imposed by Wolves.
Surely it’s up to us, or who we appoint on our behalf, to negotiate a fee with the buying club?
An additional stakeholder in negotiations, who is not directly interested in the Portuguese’s future but only in the economic and commercial terms, will inflate the finances involved.
I’m not interested in his future just what losses we minimise on the whole charade.
Gestifute aren't doing it for free. But Guo will still get his cut as a part owner. That's the only reason they are involved. For the good of him, to the detriment of the clubAn additional stakeholder in negotiations, who is not directly interested in the Portuguese’s future but only in the economic and commercial terms, will inflate the finances involved.
Good point, well madeWho cares, good riddance.