Discuss yes but I just can't get my head around it being a bad thing if true.Obviously we can only comment on what we’re reading online and 99% of it is likely bullshit (but where’s the fun in not discussing it?!).
We seem to lowball with our offers to clubs - and now we’re seemingly paying less as a PL club than a Brazilian top flight club. And for a key target.
It’s not a great look.
But yeah, in the cold light of day, fuck knows what’s true. I won’t let that stop me from slating Jeff, though. The prick.
Well you know fuck all about every transaction we do too, so perhaps you should refrain from commenting?All good and it's just another opportunity for you to have a go at the club when basically you know fuck all about the transaction.
Fuck off with your FACTS! We should be ANGRYBefore losing our shit about wages it would be rather useful to know what he's currently on
Thanks Kenny
Already noted in a previous comment that the highest reported weekly salary anywhere online for him is £45k per week. If he’s one of our top targets (and he appears to be), then it’s pretty shocking stuff if we’re offering him less and expecting him to take a pay cut.Before losing our shit about wages it would be rather useful to know what he's currently on
Why? People get hired on lower salaries all the time.Already noted in a previous comment that the highest reported weekly salary anywhere online for him is £45k per week. If he’s one of our top targets (and he appears to be), then it’s pretty shocking stuff if we’re offering him less and expecting him to take a pay cut.
No, still can't my head around that.Already noted in a previous comment that the highest reported weekly salary anywhere online for him is £45k per week. If he’s one of our top targets (and he appears to be), then it’s pretty shocking stuff if we’re offering him less and expecting him to take a pay cut.
Most if not all clubs will low ball though. Man City tried it on RANIt doesn't even strike you as unusual or noteworthy? I think it's exceedingly odd tbh, and it may not have cost us this time, but who knows what it's cost us if lowballing is a frequent strategy
Id put a fairly large chunk of my life savings on us paying him more than 45k per weekAlready noted in a previous comment that the highest reported weekly salary anywhere online for him is £45k per week. If he’s one of our top targets (and he appears to be), then it’s pretty shocking stuff if we’re offering him less and expecting him to take a pay cut.
Not them reporting it to be fair. They are just sharing a Twitter postCockwomble Talking Wolves debunked.