AndyWolves
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2010
- Messages
- 17,708
- Reaction score
- 8,190
Greens it is then
Voting for a party you have no faith in, to stop another party winning who you find abhorrent is fucking dismal though isnt it?
Where is the hope?
Is it? A lot of people voted Labour in the last election simply to get the Tories out.A very simplistic view of party politics. There's more than just your or my definition of hope.
Also, a political party isn't a religion, or your favourite band when you were 16
Yeah bit of projection going on here. See how people leap to defend Starmer just cos he's on their team.Is it? A lot of people voted Labour in the last election simply to get the Tories out.
Not sure what you mean with the last sentence either, i have completely lost my support for Labour, if I did vote tribally, i'd be voting for them and defending then blindly forever?
Unless it's a general point, then yes I agree, but i don't see how it applies to my post.
He's written one about every Prime Minister since Thatcher.I’m reading Truss at 10 by Anthony Sheldon which is a great in depth analysis of that particular car crash. He may need to sharpen his pen to write a book on Starmer quite soon.
Yeah bit of projection going on here. See how people leap to defend Starmer just cos he's on their team.
Is it? A lot of people voted Labour in the last election simply to get the Tories out.
Not sure what you mean with the last sentence either, i have completely lost my support for Labour, if I did vote tribally, i'd be voting for them and defending them blindly forever?
Unless it's a general point, then yes I agree, but i don't see how it applies to my post.
I mean if anyone is pissed off with the state of Labour and have environmentally sympathetic leanings then I suppose a vote in that direction when there’s absolutely no chance of them forming a government is understandable, but a bit like Reform, a lot of that perceived support would freak out at the prospect of the reality and evaporate when push comes to shove.Greens it is then
And you suggested I was simplistic PK?! How patronising.
By hope, i mean progressive policies and arguments, an attempt at changing the narrative regarding immigration, not adding to it.
Perhaps arguing against the idea that people on benefits are "scroungers" and/or lazy which has been pushed at us for a couple of decades now?
Perhaps explaining why international aid is important for trade and diplomacy?
As a nation we have got more racist and selfish since the turn of the century, maybe trying to address that?
They're in power, they have a really strong majority. I was told that they were saying what they needed to say to get into power, but then they'd commit to more progressive centrist/left ideas once they were in power. They havent have they, quite the opposite.
It's negative, it's largely a continuation of Tory policy, it's not hopeful. It's more of the same.
I mean if anyone is pissed off with the state of Labour
Currently self-flagellating that they're "no better than the Tories were".I can't remember a time where some huge chunk of Labour weren't pissed off at the state of the party, it's the nature of the beast. Always too left, too right, too centrist...part of the reason why the Tories are the 'natural party of government'
That's what they are.Also Labours communication is fucking awful, what do they stand for?
"An active government"
"A leaner and more agile government"
It's meaningless, just corporate speak.
The things EP talks about don't cost any money though? He's just on about the govt using more positive language on immigration and benefits. It's quite a low bar tbf.I don't totally disagree, in that I'd prefer Starmer's Labour to be braver and bolder, but I don't believe it's the job of government to morally lecture us all on the progressive ticklist you describe, and crusade to change the face of a resistant nation so bluntly in 5 years! Not when there are other, more pragmatic, fiscal priorities.
using more positive language on immigration and benefits.