• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Keir Starmer at it again..

The Mail has it being due to a woke rebrand, the Telegraph as a personal embarrassment to the PM. I guess if you want to consume headlines from those 2 places you aren’t going to get any balance to the issue.
The whole place could have closed if the tariffs were not renegotiated.
I've no dog in this fight, but just thought it was particularly funny given the words Vis used..


1000110280.jpg
 
Funny is an odd word to use about job losses.
It wasnt "about job losses" though was it.

It was about Vis seeminginly proudly stating that he'd kept a promise whilst this JLR news was circulating - a promise he'd made so firmly above.

That is what was "funny" but you know that.
 
No doubt this is a good thing. But it has to be backed up by education in schools about politics and voting and educating young people about social media and how it influences voting intentions and pushes confusing and blatantly wrong messages.
The Brexit result proved that many adults haven’t got the intelligence to vote. Their naivety still winds me up many years later.
 
Losses at JLR would have been worse had Starmer not negotiated a trade deal with Trump though?
 
Mixed feelings tbh.

If it’s a road we’re going down then let’s do the same with the gambling age, age you can buy alcohol, driving age, age you can get married, age you get sent to an adult prison, buy tobacco, fireworks etc etc.

Seems a bit odd to allow someone to vote to affect the governance of the country but you don’t trust them enough to buy a firework.
 
Mixed feelings tbh.

If it’s a road we’re going down then let’s do the same with the gambling age, age you can buy alcohol, driving age, age you can get married, age you get sent to an adult prison, buy tobacco, fireworks etc etc.

Seems a bit odd to allow someone to vote to affect the governance of the country but you don’t trust them enough to buy a firework.
I think the bigger issue is that you wouldn’t trust half the people on the ballot paper with a firework.
 
Mixed feelings tbh.

If it’s a road we’re going down then let’s do the same with the gambling age, age you can buy alcohol, driving age, age you can get married, age you get sent to an adult prison, buy tobacco, fireworks etc etc.

Seems a bit odd to allow someone to vote to affect the governance of the country but you don’t trust them enough to buy a firework.
Equally we don't take away the right to vote from people with dementia etc.
 
Teenagers who don't think about politics won't be bothered to vote, any that do vote you'd expect to have some ethos they support and will put thought into their vote.
Chances are they'll have very different views to me but that's ok, it's the nature of democracy.
 
You'd think it's better news for Labour than Tories and also would mean some votes heading the way of Greens and any splinter far left party.

There are plenty of rotten old people who vote in regressive and selfish ways so fuck it, let the young uns have their say
 
it is true though, sadly. their social media influence (plus cunts like the tates) means that is where they get their messages out.
 
Back
Top