• Welcome, guest!

    This is a forum devoted to discussion of Wolverhampton Wanderers.
    Why not sign up and contribute? Registered members get a fully ad-free experience!

Welcome to Wolves Jorgen Strand Larsen

Not correct, not really

It's an accounting trick, punting the fee into next year (no idea why we bother as we never spend what we bring in)

Krejci isn't really 'on loan' now
 
Based on what? Absolutely nothing but your own fantasy as per. And as always the 'point you're making' changes as all the evidence stacks up against it.

Literally one bald man fighting over a comb.
It hasn't changed at all, all that's changed is your understanding of my point.

Remember you felt it necessary to tell me that he would have had agreed a contract for if he signed permanently, as if i wouldn't already know that, that's how little you understood what I was saying, because you are the cleverest person in the room.

He then went on to score 14 goals between signing on loan and signing permanently, and much like his market value went up because of that, it went up because of Newcastle's offers too.

So his agent pushed for a new deal because of Newcastle, but didnt bother because of the 14 no penalty Premier league goals? OK...

Oh and let's not forget that Mendes has been involved with JSL too another reason why we'd get bullied.
 
Not correct, not really

It's an accounting trick, punting the fee into next year (no idea why we bother as we never spend what we bring in)

Krejci isn't really 'on loan' now
And yet it literally is. We announced his signing on loan in July 2024 and then his signing permanently in July 2025.

We do do it for accountancy purposes, but that isn’t what im arguing, JSL had a lovely opportunity to get himself a better deal after a good season, and again with Newcastle coming in.

I don't think we would be giving JSL 75k to sign from Celta, I know you disagree with that based on him being 25mill, and thats fair enough I think it'd be nearer 50k.

Presumably you think Krejci is on around 75k too on the same basis?
 
I neither know nor care to be honest.

I do know he's a Wolves player in all but name and we won't be negotiating terms with him and his agent next summer.
 
I neither know nor care to be honest.

I do know he's a Wolves player in all but name and we won't be negotiating terms with him and his agent next summer.
Oh that's a good cop out.

If he has an outstanding season and wins our player of the season (for example) of course his agent would be pushing for a better deal than what he signed a few weeks ago, and rightly so.

Or maybe his agent would only spring into action and improve his terms when Arsenal offer 60 million for him next August :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
And yet it literally is. We announced his signing on loan in July 2024 and then his signing permanently in July 2025.

We do do it for accountancy purposes, but that isn’t what im arguing, JSL had a lovely opportunity to get himself a better deal after a good season, and again with Newcastle coming in.

I don't think we would be giving JSL 75k to sign from Celta, I know you disagree with that based on him being 25mill, and thats fair enough I think it'd be nearer 50k.

Presumably you think Krejci is on around 75k too on the same basis?
Seyi got sacked from grasshoppers for not agreeing a permanent contract with kaly sene at the same time they signed him on loan (with a view to a permanent move).

The norm is to sign and agree the permanent part of the deal (contract) when the whole deal is put together, not to negotiate after the permanent criteria has been hit.
 
Good luck with that given he's already effectively signed a long term deal, as Jørgen did, as Jonny Otto did, as Willy Boly did, etc etc.

Believe what you like though, you clearly aren't going to change your mind no matter how many different ways we all phrase it.
 
Feel like the forum is dying a death by a thousand cuts with these pointless arguments.

Agree with their posts or use of emojis or not losing posters like Tony Tower, MARKakaJIM etc and other posters participating less and less (myself included) just leaves this bullshit.

Good luck meeting running costs for the forum when it's up for renewal.
 
Good luck with that given he's already effectively signed a long term deal, as Jørgen did, as Jonny Otto did, as Willy Boly did, etc etc.

Believe what you like though, you clearly aren't going to change your mind no matter how many different ways we all phrase it.
I fully understand what you and Lycan are saying, I just have a different opinion to you, that is ok isn't it?
 
Literally in that post, mate. :LOL:
Ah it's a slow night, and just a language thing Alan, We have, for instance ALUMINIUM pronounced more or less as it's spelt.
But you guys would say it as 'Aloominum'.
So I was curious that you picked on 'PYJAMAS'.... as opposed to...?
 
I know, bud.

Fun fact: Humphry Davy called it aluminum, and it was (mostly) the French who insisted it be changed to aluminium.
 
Back
Top