Elephant Pyjamas
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2011
- Messages
- 12,340
- Reaction score
- 8,558
Oh look, Mark with laughing emoji rather than explaining why he disagrees.
They're in a discussion with the ref who is on the field. Them being able to explain who the player(s) involved concisely and accurately rather than the "Wolves player" ensures there is as little possible confusion as possible.Just don't see why a ref should need to learn people's names, you want them to be impartial so the less they know about anyone to influence their opinion the better in my mind. Judge the events not the parties involved.
I agree with this. It should be numbers only to keep it impartial.Just don't see why a ref should need to learn people's names, you want them to be impartial so the less they know about anyone to influence their opinion the better in my mind. Judge the events not the parties involved.
NumbersThey're in a discussion with the ref who is on the field. Them being able to explain who the player(s) involved concisely and accurately rather than the "Wolves player" ensures there is as little possible confusion as possible.
What if they didn't know who Dawson and Sasa was? How do they explain the incident properly?
If they can see them, and they didn't do that in this instance.Numbers
This comment from commentators always used to be baffle me, he demonstrably proved he is that kind of player because he's just done it!Was it - Franks not that kind of player after he went studs up into our players knee?
On Adam Hammill(?) Horrific tackle.Was it - Franks not that kind of player after he went studs up into our players knee?
It's OK though, just like Howard Webb, he said sorryYes and then he scored the winner in the last minute.
Scandal of a tackle that on Wardy. Matt Carbon levels.Fabregas also wasn't that type of player
I think the ref said it.This comment from commentators always used to be baffle me, he demonstrably proved he is that kind of player because he's just done it!
He might not do it much, but he definitely did that thing I just saw him do!
Watching the rest of the program the officials calling each other by their nicknames in other games wound me up.Always used to wind me up when refs called high profile players by their first name. Typically while they were mouthing off or refusing to come over when summoned.
It's not "Ashley" or "Ash", it's "Blue, three".
It does feel like they don't take it seriously and it's a boys club.Watching the rest of the program the officials calling each other by their nicknames in other games wound me up.
Believe it’s again on TNT sports tonight if anyone wants to watch it.
They're in a discussion with the ref who is on the field. Them being able to explain who the player(s) involved concisely and accurately rather than the "Wolves player" ensures there is as little possible confusion as possible.
What if they didn't know who Dawson and Sasa was? How do they explain the incident properly?
Yeah, but they didn't even do that.Wolves No. X would suffice, would it not?