I still don't understand this way of thinking. I don't know what Bruno has said at HT but I am pretty darn sure it wasn't "go out and defend, don't worry about scoring goals or trying to score though".
At least I understand this analogy a bit. Don't agree with it, but can get the logic.
Can't possibly imagine having this perspective but more power to you if that's how you feel, I s'pose.
I'm with you on that, but think we're in a minority. I think if we'd have kept playing that way we'd have honed it, scored chances and a have a lot more to look forward to tbh.
I'm not sure we can say that; if things had continued as they were for the first three games much longer, Bruno wouldn't be here right now.
The table agrees with you.
So before the game what were you expecting (against Chelsea)
I don't see it ever being anything more than a means to an end with this squad.
Genuinely curious what tactical benefits you think a 3-4-1-2 gives us over a flatter 3-5-2? Not saying you're wrong, just don't know enough to guess how that shift affects things.
If defending is "anti-football" I guess I don't know why you're interested in the sport at all as you don't seem to care for literally half of it.
Another attacking body rather than 3 defensive midfielders holding hands across the halfway line.
